Biden’s recent pick to head the DOJ Civil Rights Division is a woman by the name of Kristen Clarke, who has some very astonishing views on “racial science”, giving us a preview of how Biden’s administration will handle racial politics in America.
In 1994, Clarke wrote a letter to The Harvard Crimson in her capacity as the president of the Black Students Association to explain her views on race science.
“Please use the following theories and observations to assist you in your search for truth regarding the genetic differences between Blacks and whites [sic],” Clarke wrote. “One: Dr Richard King reveals that the core of the human brain is the ‘locus coeruleus,’ which is a structure that is Black, because it contains large amounts of neuro-melanin, which is essential for its operation.
“Two: Black infants sit, crawl and walk sooner than whites [sic]. Three: Carol Barnes notes that human mental processes are controlled by melanin — that same chemical which gives Blacks their superior physical and mental abilities.
“Four: Some scientists have revealed that most whites [sic] are unable to produce melanin because their pineal glands are often calcified or non-functioning. Pineal calcification rates with Africans are five to 15 percent [sic], Asians 15 to 25 percent [sic] and Europeans 60 to 80 percent [sic]. This is the chemical basis for the cultural differences between blacks and whites [sic].
“Five: Melanin endows Blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured based on Eurocentric standards.”
No, this isn’t some disgusting diatribe penned by racial supremacist Louis Farrakhan, it’s Joe Biden’s pick to head the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division. For decades we have been told this kind of racial thinking is dangerous – the same kind of thinking that led to the holocaust. If you voted for Biden, you most likely are not racist or supremacist – however, this kind of racist policy was predicted by many in the center and on the right. The intersectional ideology the left is currently operating on is racist at it’s core, calling for a racial awakening among Americans.
When did this become ok in the mainstream?
Even at Harvard, crackpot theories like that were considered deranged and dangerous. After an outcry on campus, Kristen Clarke suggested that she didn’t necessarily believe what she had written. The left-wing Harvard Crimson didn’t buy that explanation. “Well, does she or doesn’t she?” wrote the editors. “So far, she has given us every indication that she does.”
Just a month later, Clarke invited the noted Trinidadian anti-Semite Tony Martin to speak on campus. Martin, then a professor at Wellesley College, was the author of a self-published manifesto called “The Jewish Onslaught.” In it, Martin chronicled the “escalating Jewish onslaught” against Black people.
For Martin’s fans like Kristen Clarke, his speech at Harvard did not disappoint. He attacked both Jews and Judaism as a religion. Martin, who retired from Wellesley in 2007 and died in 2013, spent his final years giving speeches to Holocaust denial organizations on topics such as “tactics of organized Jewry in suppressing free speech.”
Kristen Clarke strongly approved of Tony Martin, telling The Crimson: “Professor Martin is an intelligent, well-versed Black intellectual who bases his information on indisputable fact.” According to Kristen Clarke, Tony Martin’s anti-Semitism was based on “indisputable fact.”
Kristen Clarke has never shed these views. They’ve simply become more sophisticated. Just last year, Clarke was fighting for the crudest kind of racial discrimination in college admissions, saying it was “madness” for the federal government to take the side of Asian applicants who had provably been denied college admission on the basis of their skin color.